{"id":7421,"date":"2015-12-21T09:34:28","date_gmt":"2015-12-21T12:34:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/?p=7421"},"modified":"2015-12-21T09:37:55","modified_gmt":"2015-12-21T12:37:55","slug":"call-for-papers-ecpr-ethnopol","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/?p=7421","title":{"rendered":"Call for papers ECPR \/ EthnoPol"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"unnamed\"<\/a>\"unnamed\"<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Call for papers ECPR \/ EthnoPol
\n<\/span><\/b>Political Mobilization from an Ethnographic Perspective<\/span>
\n<\/b><\/i><\/span>ECPR General Conference, Prague, 7-10 September 2016<\/span><\/b><\/h3>\n

Please find below an abstract for the panel \u00ab Political Mobilization from an Ethnographic Perspective \u00bb \u00a0at the ECPR General Conference to be held in Prague on 7-10 September 2016. The panel is hosted in the session S53 \u00ab Power and Authority in Political Actions in Europe \u00bb endorsed by the ECPR Standing group on Political sociology.<\/span><\/p>\n

If you are interested in joining the panel, please email an abstract <\/span><\/b>of no more than 500 words to Romain Pudal (<\/span>romain.pudal@free.fr<\/a><\/u><\/span>) and Marie Vannetzel (<\/span>marie.vannetzel@gmail.com<\/a><\/u><\/span>) <\/span>before 1st February.<\/strong><\/span>
\n<\/span>
\n<\/span>Political Mobilization from an Ethnographic Perspective
\n<\/span><\/b>In perusing the academic literature on \u00abordinary\u00bb relations to politics and politicization (specifically in the working class), numerous studies reveal the multiple forms of incompetence , disinterest , and even apathy supposed to exist in this milieu, while others point out the absence of politics, its diminishing presence, or even its avoidance . However, ethnographic inquiries can drive us to radically rethink our initial conception and to become more attentive to the methods of creation and expression of political opinions. It also steered us towards a more interactionist approach to politicization \u00a0that sought to construct an ethnography of ordinary relations to politics . We can reconstruct certain elements of a study in line with the \u00abMalinowskian revolution\u00bb: long-term immersion, primacy conferred to context, and beliefs inferred by the researcher without exclusive recourse to propositional content. Political opinions appeared less as \u201ca deliberate choice founded on free will according to the ordinary conception of the political game, surveys, and political intellectuals\u201d , than as variable translations of specific social and professional conditions . In this sense, this panel will contribute to the debate around the arguments set forth by Anne Norton, who prompts reflection on American citizens’ \u201cordinary relations\u201d to politics by fully delving into their daily life, since, according to her, a better understanding of individuals’ behavior in ordinary times sheds light on their political behavior in general, as well as on their political behavior during particular events, such as elections.<\/span><\/p>\n

The panel welcomes contributions addressing cases located in different social backgrounds, as the ordinary formation process of opinions stands as a cross-cutting question and can be best understood through comparative ethnography.<\/p>\n

Convenors: Romain Pudal (Centre Universitaire de Recherches sur l’Action Publique et le Politique, CURAPP) and Marie Vannetzel (Centre Universitaire de Recherches sur l’Action Publique et le Politique, CURAPP), for the AFSP Network EthnoPol (https:\/\/www.afsp.info\/gp\/<\/span>ethnopol.html<\/a><\/u><\/span>) <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

            Call for papers ECPR \/ EthnoPol Political Mobilization from an Ethnographic Perspective ECPR General Conference, Prague, 7-10 September 2016 Please find below an abstract for the panel \u00ab Political Mobilization from an Ethnographic Perspective \u00bb \u00a0at the ECPR General Conference to be held in Prague on 7-10 September 2016. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":88890,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[15],"tags":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-7421","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","6":"category-menu-ementas","7":"entry","8":"has-post-thumbnail"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7421","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/88890"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7421"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7421\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7425,"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7421\/revisions\/7425"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7421"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7421"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/alacip.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7421"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}